Is FOX News a cult?

July 24, 2010

Fox News is Not Just Biased — It’s a Cult
by Bryant Welch

The danger Fox News poses to America is not that it is a biased or partisan arm of the Republican Party, as the Obama Administration contends. Fox is a danger because it is a cult and uses the same destabilizing psychological techniques cults use to undermine the independent functioning of minds they want to control.

Once unleashed, these cult-like techniques can ultimately take on a life of their own and become very dangerous, especially to the most important of all American freedoms, the freedom of thought. The most precise term for these techniques is mind control.

Unfortunately, by focusing on Fox News’ bias, the Administration diverts attention from the true problem. Fox is a powerful system of mind control that makes a mockery of the principles of self-reliance and individual responsibility for which Fox adherents ostensibly stand.

For cults, like Fox News, their objective is total control of the victim’s mind so that the viewer becomes the easily manipulated pawn of the cult. The cult leadership is not satisfied to merely convince the listener of a particular point of view. The cult wants to effectively pull the levers inside the listener’s mind, and direct that mind lock, stock and barrel. The cult will measure its own success by the relative ease with which it is able to do this.

As with any successful vehicle of thought control in a democratic society, overtly coercive tools of domination are not available as they are in more traditionally authoritarian regimes. People must not only join the cult voluntarily, they must also join without any awareness they have joined a cult.

Fox succeeds in both of these tasks in large part because they successfully penetrates their viewers’ minds in such a way that the viewers do not experience Fox News as telling them what to believe, what to do or, for that matter, even as advocating for what Fox News believes.

Instead, the Fox viewer has the experience of hearing something they believe they have already known or felt before, whether they have or have not, not unlike a déjà vu experience. The difference between psychological suggestion and independent thought is lost on the person succumbing to psychological suggestion.

Similarly, on an emotional level, Fox News elicits feelings of resentment from people, feelings which may be there to some extent, but which become far more pronounced by the time the extensive Fox commentary is over. Fox cleverly mirrors and amplifies these feelings explaining why any “sane” person would have the same feelings. The most common emotions in these cases are anger, disgust, and contempt. Humanistic emotions of compassion, love, and humor are almost totally lacking.

Many of the rest of us, the “non-adherents,” if you will, cannot understand how people can stand to listen to Fox News with its non-stop onslaught of what we experience as invective. What we don’t allow for in our assessment, because we don’t experience it, is the extraordinary relief Fox “commentary” provides to the minds of its adherents. It keeps listeners feeling certain, justified, and stimulated all day long, 24-7. This is no trivial psychological service.

Fox appears to provide a 24/7 fortification of people’s “own” political beliefs. And it is presented in a manner that ostensibly justifies a badly felt need for an emotional catharsis, especially rage, generated by the confusion people feel over the complexity of modern political and cultural issues. Helping people organize a suitable target for this rage requires creativity, good organizational skills and an interest in domination.

These psychological “services” make Fox a Trojan Horse ostensibly bearing psychological gifts that give Fox free entry to the mind of its listeners and enabling it to surreptitiously exercise longstanding Orwellian techniques of thought control. Well orchestrated, repetitive talking points, limited to a very few key “loaded words,” to borrow Orwell’s term, take on great psychological effectiveness. The words become mental implants, not arguments or policy justifications.

In this and other ways, the mind is gradually seduced into letting Fox have its way with the subjects’ psyche with remarkably little resistance. People display a robotic acquiescence to positions and attitudes that heretofore had never been of concern to them.

We have all experienced this striking transition with our own friends and acquaintances, and many of us have even experienced it with loved ones. It is as if one day they are there and reachable and the next they are shut off from us, unreachable by rational discussion. Some literally have a faraway look in their eyes. These are like the terrifying encounters that families of young people confront when their child has been “captured” by a cult. The Fox News cult is one that appeals to “children of all ages.”

After a certain period of time in such a dependent state, the mind is too enfeebled to reestablish any independence. This is what is often referred to as the “dumbing-down” of America.

This is also why we are seeing in Fox News adherents increasing evidence of cult influence. The Republican conventioneers riotous laughter at the phrase “Drill, Baby, drill,” the “birthers” crazily insisting that Obama was born in Kenya, and the “deathers” insisting that the government was putting a clause in the health insurance reform package that would be a “death sentence” for them all suggest that rapturous, cult-induced, vacuous thinking has increasingly replaced rational and independent thought.

The effects of the manipulations of a cult are very difficult to reverse. Cults are known for the casualties they cause. For some people, the loss of a connection to their cult is followed by acute psychiatric breakdowns. For a democratic society to have so many of its independent minds under this kind of assault is extremely dangerous as the ill-conceived ventures we have undertaken as a nation over the last decade so painfully illustrate.

Cults need to grow or they wither. They are dependent upon the vampire-like, insatiable need to bring new “blood” into the system with its invigorating impact on the group. How far Fox can go is unclear, but there is no apparent limit to its potential expansion at the present time.

Arthur Miller’s 1945 novel Focus made into a 2002 movie by the same name starring William Macy and Laura Dern provides a chilling portrayal of the spread of a political cult with an unnamed prejudice, presumably anti-semitism. For readers who have not seen it, it will provide an eerie reminder to the feeling you have when your neighbor almost overnight seems to have “swallowed the kool aid” and tells you, as one of my friends did, that he listens to Fox News because it is “fair and balanced.” This was not an independent thought my friend had. It was a “thought” chip that had been implanted in his mind by Fox News.

Cults provide a powerful temporary balm to a troubled mind — they provide simplicity in the form of a surrender of the struggle an independent confronts. “Give me your tired and uncertain mind, and I will keep you safe from the complexities, uncertainties and fears that afflict you.” It is, of course, from the perspective of the person’s mental functioning, a Faustian barter with the devil except that one surrenders the mind, not the soul.

The problem is that with each surrender of an independent mind, there is a strong likelihood that that mind will never return to independent functioning, but, instead, will be in the service of inherently repressive cult-like forces who can only function in what is really a lifeless existence where processes of destruction substitute for life and vitality,

The Obama Administration is right to be concerned about Fox News. But Fox is not just another biased news media. Fox is a cult.

Bryant Welch, J.D., Ph.D. is a clinical psychologist and attorney. He is the author of State of Confusion: Political Manipulation and the Assault on the American Mind (St Martin’s Press, 2008.)


Fox Crops videos, is there any truth from this station?

May 5, 2009

It is often said that Fox News is a right wing leaning station or conservative station. However, what is conservative about lying or editing videos in a deceitful manner? Do conservative values and principles include misleading the public?

Glenn Beck’s dressing room

April 26, 2009

I didn’t make this, but it’s funny and should be true

FOX News John Gibson compares Attorney General Eric Holder to an angry Monkey. Is this a HOAX?

February 20, 2009

Original story

Looks like John Gibson decided to play the role of a coward. Rather than listening to the substance of Attorney General Eric Holder’s message during Black History Month, Gibson chose to exchange maturity for racism. Even if he disagreed with the wording that Holder used when referring to our nations responses concerning race, it’s no justification for turning around and being racist. Sadly, Gibson seems much more comfortable being a racist coward than being a man and a mature American.

EDIT: It looks like this video above might have been a hoax. Here is another version of the video that claims to show what John Gibson ACTUALLY said.

If this video I just posted in the update is true, as it appears to be, then I would like to issue an apology to John Gibson and Fox News for putting out the other video first. I did, however, see the first video on, so it looks like the video editor fooled them too with the “Blue Strotum” comment.

MSM LIED! Barack Obama destroyed Iraq “flip flop” accusations back on March 20th

July 7, 2008

CNN, CBS, ABC, NBC, FOX News, MSNBC, all of the major networks along with newspapers and pundits have questioned constantly whether Obama flip flopped on the Iraq War.  Above is the full speech Obama gave on the subject back on March 20, 2008.   Oddly, few in the press seem to remember it, because from 10:38 on, Obama takes on similar charges from Hillary Clinton during the primaries.

If you can see the whole thing, please do.  If not, watch 10:38-12:20

Racism from FOX News should cause the network to lose its FCC license.

June 13, 2008

An explaination of this photo is found here:

Someone’s baby mama is an urban term that refers to a woman whom you never married although you had children by her and you are no longer involved with her. By labeling Michelle as Obama’s baby mama, they are calling her a whore and calling their two children bastards. This is the likely next first lady and first family of the United States. This wasn’t just a comment that might have slipped out of someone’s mouth. This was a chiron that was preplanned to go with the picture of the likely next first lady. What would the Right do if a major media outlet had a picture of Laura Bush and a chiron calling her a whore and calling her two daughters bastards? Seriously how do you think they would react?

This type of behavior should not be tolerated!  FOX News is spitting on our Declaration of Independence which states that “All men are created equal”, and fanning the flames of racism that is the shame of America since it was founded.  This comes on the heels of the Obama/Osama gaffe by a Fox reporter who then joked of assassinating Obama.  Then, another Fox News anchor called Obama’s fist pound a “terrorist fist jab”, again referencing Osama Bin Laden.  If there aren’t consequences for this behavio, then it will continue.

Pennsylvania Gov. Ed Rendell praises Islam & Louis Farrakhan

April 21, 2008